The blog called “Let’s be honest about J-school” is written by Patrick Thornton. He informs people about why they should or should not attend journalism school. Although his piece is highly rated and it showcases both positive and negative aspects of attending a journalism school, he focuses most of the attention on the latter. Top-ranked J-schools are viewed as “horribly outdated” with “outdated curriculums”. Patrick firmly believes that if one attends a journalism program, one should be taught how to start one’s own projects, thus becoming entrepreneurial. The main realisation that should be made is that the present and future of journalism has made its mark on the (social) web. This obviously then leaves little room for admiration of journalists. Patrick even goes so far as to show how a top J-school has little or no impact on a graduate who admits to getting most of his meaningful and practical connections while working and not while studying.
Another negative notion about J-schooling that Patrick mentions is the idea that professors at most of these prestigious schools/institutions are ‘old-fashioned’ in a sense and not in tune with modern technology, journalism, the social web and web design. Another idea is that a postgraduate degree in journalism is not always the better or safer option. One has to firstly question the motives and long term goals of one’s foreseen career, thus making it easier to choose wisely and not ending up wasting time studying. Patrick also says that hoping to get connections or improving writing skills whilst doing a postgraduate degree, should not at all influence the choice of studying further. He feels, from experience, that most connections come from being active in the journalism/working community. Social networks such as Twitter and Wired journalists also help. Most of his connections were built online but Patrick feels that this is where journalism is going anyway.
Patrick not only mentions other options, besides J-schooling, but he also feels that writing skills are overrated. An important and perhaps most salient point in his blog is that reporting is the heart of journalism and not writing. He believes that great journalism has always been about great reporting. However, he still encourages those who already have training in writing and says that the best way to improve one’s writing is to do more of it.
A comment was made by King Kaufman who feels that journalism education can either be academic or it can be a trade school. He learned basic skills during his years of studying at a ‘grad J-school’ (UC-Berkeley) but made connections whilst working at the San Francisco Examiner. This then, in essence, nicely compliments Patrick’s thoughts on J-schooling.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
You have a good writing style, Tatum - well done.
ReplyDeleteFor the other side of the story on journalism training - see: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/aug/22/media-studies
Also, go again to http://ow.ly/ky3A - and then you click on the image of King Kaufman to get his most recent post: The man in charge of online news, 1981. This article is important because it gives an overview of how circulation of news electronically has developed since the advent of internet, i.e. in the past 30 years. There is currently a debate on whether newspapers are losing readers because of the internet, and so should see electronic news circulation as competition, where the i-net gives an unfair advantage. The alternative view is that the big news companies have a monopoly, they control too much of what we see and what not ... and the i-net gives others a chance to get their views circulated as well. For this - see http://dominicself.co.uk/blog/?query=&amount=0&blogid=1
I found your comment on Semenya - and I've inserted it here. Below is my comment back to you:
ReplyDeleteLook again at the phrase "winning streak" in a dictionary - the way you use it here, is not quite right. You mean she is one of the South African winner in international athletics, her country recognises and honours her for that.
Otherwise you make a very good point: Semenya's country, all the way up to the president, supports her - particularly after the very insensitive way in which the IAAF responded to questions about gender testing. Remember it is long accepted that questions may be asked about performance enhancing drugs - but gender testing is quite another matter and they dealt with it in a much worse way than they have ever done in testing other athletes for use of forbidden substances. They have actually shamed themselves!
Caster Semenya, a person our president has titled HONEST and COMPETENT, has done nothing but make her mark on our country’s winning streak. Even though the results of her gender test will only be available in a month, the questioning and rumours alone have already destroyed and completely dehumanized the career of a young 18 year old who clearly deserves to enjoy HER youth and HER RIGHTFUL achievements.
I know what the term "winning streak" refers to and I did not give reference to Caster Semenya's winning streak but that of our country. South Africa has done really well in Sports and Athletics specifically our Rugby team and Long jump athletes. I was referring to how well our country has been doing and not how well Caster Semenya has been continuously doing in international Athlethics.
ReplyDelete